ADVERTISEMENT

Nelson! (don't mean to steal Homeria98's thunder but...)

I just got back from the only sports bar here in Bocas. The place was totally packed (remember this is the tropice, so it was totally open air) Somehow I got a seat at the bar. On both sides of me were Eagles fans, six of them. I think the oldest was 32, all surfers. The whole rest of the bar were for the Patriots, at least that's what it seemed. Being the "old guy" but also making sure they knew I surfed, they totally gave me the up-most respect. Not being a pro football fan, college is all I care about, but having in the past a soft spot for the Eagles, I joined in. What a game! Two were from USC(University of South Carolina), which I really had fun with that, as you can understand. But, when both Jefferson (SC commit who ended up a Gamecock) and Nelson had great games, we put our differences aside and high-five'd our way into lasting friendship.

When the Eagles finally won, we were all over the moon partying. Not one of them had a dry eye. They were all texting family and friends, hooting and hollering the whole time. After three celebratory shots of tequila, I dragged my ass out of there.

What a lucky time I had!

Just wanted to share that before I pass out. LOL!!!

Fight on!

USC's recruiting conundrum

Why didn't local defensive back Julius Irvin commit to USC? He has his reasons, of course. But the Trojans have theirs, too, and they shed light on what's to come in the next week.

We've been reporting for months that space is at a premium in the 2018 class. It's become apparent that this predicament has largely dictated USC's recruiting approach for the past two months.

The Trojans fulfilled most of their pressing roster needs during the early signing period. They would have had JT Daniels and Amon-Ra St. Brown sign sooner, only both of them wished to announce their intentions at the Army Bowl. (Daniels was thwarted when word got out that he was reclassifying.) Trevor Trout, meanwhile, wanted to wait out potential coaching changes. Conversely, two individuals who were ready to sign in December but were told to wait were Irvin and Tuli Letuligasenoa. That comes back to a lack of scholarships.

The Trojans would like to add another safety and third D-lineman, but neither is nearly as big of a priority as, say, a second cornerback.

If USC had room to sign 25 players, Irvin and Letuligasenoa would already be in its class. Instead, the Trojans have had to be careful with how they communicate to targets who are wanted but not positioned at the top of their board.

Given the 10 who already signed, the remaining needs are at quarterback, wide receiver, defensive lineman and cornerback. The first three will be satisfied by Daniels, St. Brown and, barring any last-minute changes, Trout. Olaijah Griffin is the first option at cornerback and we're predicting he signs with the Trojans. That would put USC at 14 members, which is the same number of spots available before factoring in transfers. At least two players have communicated their plans to transfer, but with no guarantees beyond that, the staff hasn't had an exact number to work with throughout the most critical recruiting period.

In our perfect class breakdown, we listed a third offensive lineman, fifth linebacker, second safety, second tailback and second wide receiver as the remaining needs. We were informed last week that adding a third cornerback is also a priority. Here's where USC stands on those fronts:
  • OL: USC is a finalist for Penei Sewell, along with Utah, Oregon and Alabama. He's a big priority for the staff, but if the Trojans can't close here, it opens the door for someone listed below.
  • LB: Solomon Tuliaupupu is expected to sign with USC. Eli'jah Winston is a possibility, if there's room.
  • S: USC is a finalist for Devon Williams, though he's wavered between the Trojans and Oregon and is thought to be leaning toward the Ducks again. Williams could also serve as a second wide receiver, perhaps vaulting him on USC's overall board.
  • TB: The staff appears to have completely moved on from this position.
  • WR: Williams would be the guy.
  • CB: With Griffin expected to sign, Isaac Taylor-Stuart becomes somewhat of a luxury. He's also a hard read. USC wants him but might not have space, depending on what happens with the players above.
Clay Helton has said, after each of his two signing days as the head coach, he basically knew going in who would end up at USC. On the eve of his third class, it appears like that won't be the case. And it's essentially a matter of space.

USC target committing tomorrow...

I'm calling high schools to get announcement times for signing day set in stone (story coming).

Along the way, I called Central Catholic HS in Portland, Ore. to check in on four-star linebacker Eli'Jah Winston. Winston will make a commitment around 11:10 AM tomorrow. Thats because his high school is holding its signing day announcements a day early.

I was told that the high school made two signs for his commitment, one for Oregon and one for USC. I was told that they're doing that because Winston wants to keep his final decision "a surprise."

I don't know what the surprise would be if he's picking Oregon but maybe they're trying to surprise chumps like me.

Login to view embedded media

The igles (SIC) beat the Patriots....

There was a Sci-fi TV show where a guy comes from another dimension and was asked how that was. He said its a great place to live "The Patriots lose very game". I think I felt the same way and I'm from this dimension.

It finally happened with the Eagles beating the Patriots though Tom Brady, like some indestructible insect, still had a shot on the last play of the game to force a 2 point play to force Overtime.

A great game with one punt total and three PAC12 guys helping the Philly win: Nick Foles from Arizona, Nelson Agholor form USC and Zach Ertz from Stanford. Take that you Eastern bigots. LOL.
  • Like
Reactions: trojanzfreak

USC OL talent

I tried to reply to another thread with this, but the formatting was problem. I still had problems but hopefully everyone gets the idea.

Guunm, I made a few corrections. Voorhees was a 4 star(not a 3 star) who coaches loved for his potential. Edoga was originally rated as a 5 star with offers form everyone, but when some teams started recruiting him as a guard they made him a 3 star as rivals drew not really believe guards can be 5 stars. And they felt he projected as a guard. You had Hemsley as 3 star but he was 4 star. He and chris brown were two players who were a little raw, but supposedly had great athleticism who the coaches really wanted. Brown seems to panning out somewhat and may have a shot at the pros next year, but hemsley has not done much. I also put the scout rating down as well. But is a little confusing as they combined with 247 a few years ago.


I also offered my opinion below as to what usc coaches thought of each player based on the way they recruited them and what national coaches thought of each each player based on the way they offered or recruited them. Remember that unless a west coast player is a superstar 5 player or at least a high 4 star type with huge potential the east coach powerhouses will not offer them or recruit them very hard. But there are so many more powerhouses on on the east coach and Midwest so a player of the same caliber from the east coast or Midwest will get more powerhouse offers than a west coast player of the same caliber. So if guys like Vera tucker. vorhees, nathan smith, brown etc. came from the east coast or midwest they probably would have had some more top east coast/midwest offers. And since usc is really the only powerhouse school on the west coast, players who are solid 4 stars in usc's eyes may not have very many powerful offers besides usc. But I still have a hunch that east coach/midwest power schools would have still rated many of our players pretty highly. They just did not recruit them because they were too far away geographically. My list of how if usc and national coaches rated our players is a just a guess from what i remember about each player's recruitment. The plus and minus signs just mean high 3 or 4 star or low 3 or 4 star.

JUNIOR/Senior or 4th and 5th year players

Scout/ usc rating/national coaches rating

C. Edoga 6-4 / 295 * 4 Star/was a 5 star 5 star 5/5

T. Lobendahn 6-3 / 290 *4 Star 4 4/4

J. Austin 6-5 / 290 *3 Star 3 3/3

J. Daniel 6-4 / 305 *4 Star 4 4 +/4+

C. Brown 6-5 / 310 *4 Star 4 4+/4+




SOPHOMORE/Junior or 3rd and 4th year players


C. Johnston 6-5 / 295 *4 Star 4 or 3(247 now says 4 star) 4-/3+

C. Smith 6-3 / 275 *3 Star 3 3+/3+

R. Hemsley6-5 / 315 *4 Star 3 4+/4


FRESHMAN/Soph or 2nd 3rd year players


J. McKenzie 6-5 / 305 *3 Star 3 4/3+ or 4-

N. Smith 6-6 / 285 *4 Star 4 or 3(compositesays 4) 4+/4

A. Jackson 6-6 / 290*4 Star 5 or 4(composite says 5) 5/5

A. Vorhees 6-6 / 310 *4 Star 3 or 4(comp now say 3) 4+/4

A. Vera-Tucker 6-4 / 300 *4 Star 4 4+/4+

B. Neilon 6-2 / 295 *4 Star[/QUOTE] 4 4/4

OT: Philly Eagles ranked as HS recruits

Nearing LOI day, Rivals looks back at how the top twenty-nine Eagles ranked as HS recruits. Names and profiles are included in the MB article, but I'm just listing star rankings for shitz-n-giggles.

5-Star: #3
4-Star: #11
3-Star: #12
2-Star: #2
1-Star: 0
0-Star: #1

https://n.rivals.com/galleries/1291

And here are twenty-eight Patriots.
5-Star: #1
4-Star: #9
3-Star: #14
2-Star: #3
1-Star: 0
0-Star: #1

https://n.rivals.com/galleries/1290

Why USC lost to the Bruins…

This was definitely a game they played well enough to win and ultimately bad enough to lose. It came down to being behind by 1 with 24 seconds to play and then another chance at 3 down with 12 to play and they didn’t convert. UCLA was 11-2 at home and play well there. But USC did do some things well: They excelled on the boards 38-32 and particularly offensive oar's 14-7 getting second chance points. they forced 12 turnovers and scored 14 points of them. and they dominated the paint with those to the tune of 34 points to 22. Stewart had a great game with 20 points, Racocevic had 14 points and 10 rebounds. Metu scored 11 points and 12 rebounds .

So what went wrong…..plenty. USC had 11 point leads and 9 points leads in the two halves. UCLA never had a lead bigger than 3. But after the two major leads USC went cold….In the first half grabbing a 27-16 lead they failed to score for 4 minutes ion 0-5 shots. In the second half they failed to score 4:37 minutes with 0-4 shooting. Outside of the above Boatwright obviously still hurting, McLaughin an off shooting night and Usher on an off night hit a combined 9 points on 2-17 shooting. Yeah the defense could have been better but the offense was offensive. Being down 1 with 24 seconds to go Aaron (who played well otherwise) lofts up a tough angle shot for a miss. After FTs make it 3 points difference USC lofts up 2 more bad 3 point shots.

But one other factor was our beloved PAC12 refs…the situation: USC up 69-67. Racovich steals the ball goes for a layup, misses and gets the rebound to go up again and gets decked by UCLAs Olesinski. Raco on the ground gets stepped over by Olesinski who is a raw and rough player. He reaches out and holds the UCLA players leg. To me that’s a flagrant followed by 2 technicals. One on each player. USS has the 2 FTs a plus the ball and Olesinski gets ejected with 2 technical fouls (that pus the flagrant). Raco, upset misses 2 FTs and USC gets the ball…right? Nope Holliday shoots 2 FTs even though he wasn’t involved (how does that work?) and the 60% shooter is replaced by a 90% shooter AND UCLA gets the ball. Of course from that USC gets 0 points and UCLA gets the 2 FTs and Welsh (who is a USC killer gets a 3. Net difference was 5 points instead of 2 and USC lost a shot opportunity. Bad call. Oh well I'll be there and hope so will a sold out crowd in 3 weeks at Galen.

BTW USC dropped but 2 spots on the tracking RPI which would give them an 11th seed, with a chance to get a lot higher with the tough remaining schedule and P12 playoff.

When was the last time USC Athletics made a good decision?

Seriously, when was the last time USC Athletics made a decision that the majority of fans, boosters, and alumni felt was good?

- Lane Kiffin as HC to replace PC = WRONG
- Not firing Lane after the Sun Bowl incident = WRONG
- Sark as HC to replace Kiffin = WRONG
- Kevin O'Hackett hired as basketball HC (and kept for 4 1/2 years, even after he got in a fight with an Arizona booster) = WRONG
- Not fighting the NCAA = WRONG
- Coliseum Renovation = WRONG
- Josh Shaw incident = WRONG
- Dillon Baxter Golf Cart incident = WRONG
- Replacing Mike Garrett with Pat Haden = WRONG
- Selling out a national historic landmark's name = WRONG
- Reducing the Coliseum's capacity but keeping the worst seats = WRONG
- Diluting or TV rights by splitting revenue evenly among all Pac-12 schools, even though they cheered when the NCAA hammered us = WRONG
- Not pulling Scott Wolf's credentials permanently = WRONG
- Not only keeping Tim Tessalone after his $100 donor comment, but also PROMOTING him = WRONG
- Caving when one of the big boosters threaten to pull his renovation money if Lynn Swann isn't hired while contracts to hire an AD whose current school has won multiple national championships = WRONG
- Handling of the De'Anthony Melton situation = WRONG
- Handling of the Chris Petersen interview = WRONG
- Not interviewing a wide range of HCs for the football HC opening (specifically not talking to Chip Kelly) = WRONG
- Handling of the Coach O as interim HC situation = WRONG
- Hiring Clay Helton as football HC with no experience = WRONG
- Hiring Chad Kreuter as baseball HC = WRONG
- Hiring Frank Cruz as baseball HC = WRONG

Seriously, what was the last correct decision USC athletics has made? Enfield? Jury is still out.

It feels that every decision USC Athletics has made even since the sanctions came down has been dead wrong.

Man, I am really getting to the end of my rope with these poor decisions... I know so many alumni/boosters who have stopped their booster memberships... At what point does the athletic department take notice?
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT