ADVERTISEMENT

LA Times Comments on "The Game"

cj

Alumni
Gold Member
Aug 5, 2003
9,112
8,911
113
I don't like...or subscribe to the LA Times. There is a clear bias against everything USC. I do however read the occasional "on-line" article.

So, the paper that's not even fit to wrap fish in...appears to have hit the nail on the head in this morning's post mortem.

I'm not including the entire article...you can read it on line...don't pay for the paper.

"USC had 10 days to prepare but wasn't prepared. The Trojans dropped passes, missed opportunities and got hoodwinked on the sort of flea-flicker play that made Petersen famous at Boise State.

USC had the fifth-year, senior quarterback, yet lost to a team starting a true freshman."

Sark said the loss was on him. Thanks for the news flash Sark. Who else would the loss be on? Two losses at home to teams that we were favored over by double digits.

Not to go political, but the media has basically said we have to get used to the "new normal" for jobs and business in this country. Now...it appears we must get used to the new "normal" for USC football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DominateTrojans!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back