Read this part of the summation first:
"Many are clamoring for USC to sue the NCAA. In fact the Court of Appeals notes the significance of the Committee on Infractions’ findings on McNair as it relates to USC: “…as Johanningmeier acknowledged in his deposition, without a finding against McNair, no penalties could have been instituted against USC for Bush’s receipt of improper benefits.” What this is saying is that without McNair, you have no case against USC as it relates to the Reggie Bush matter. This is huge."
This from Lizzele Brandt
Here is her entire article
http://www.wearesc.com/2015/12/10/court-of-appeals-gives-mcnair-greenlight-what-this-means/
It is time you sue-warriors took note.
What has happened here is the best thing "possible" for USC's shit-job-redemption by the NCAA sanctions
All you wanted to do was sue.
What is so difficult for you to grasp in this?
Why do you keep hanging on to false logic crap like political spinners?
"Many are clamoring for USC to sue the NCAA. In fact the Court of Appeals notes the significance of the Committee on Infractions’ findings on McNair as it relates to USC: “…as Johanningmeier acknowledged in his deposition, without a finding against McNair, no penalties could have been instituted against USC for Bush’s receipt of improper benefits.” What this is saying is that without McNair, you have no case against USC as it relates to the Reggie Bush matter. This is huge."
This from Lizzele Brandt
Here is her entire article
http://www.wearesc.com/2015/12/10/court-of-appeals-gives-mcnair-greenlight-what-this-means/
It is time you sue-warriors took note.
What has happened here is the best thing "possible" for USC's shit-job-redemption by the NCAA sanctions
All you wanted to do was sue.
What is so difficult for you to grasp in this?
Why do you keep hanging on to false logic crap like political spinners?
