I don't want to get into whether or not what Sark did was a big deal, but doesn't Sark also have to get a one game suspension, if for nothing less to let the players and staff know that coaches will be held to at least the same standards as the players? Yes I understand they said different things but same chapel, different pew type stuff - both exercising poor judgment in public under the influence. I actually think SC can probably just end this quickly if they did do something along those lines (it helps that both of the first 2 games are gimmes, so the it's not like there will be national focus on if SC can compete in a big game w/o their head coach).