ADVERTISEMENT

TGHorse - You were right!

Okay, now that Sam is gone one must give credit where credit is due! First let's get some background.

I went round and round with many on this site predicting that there was no way Sam would be the starter going into game 1.

I was correct,

HOWEVER, I never said that I didn't believe Sam was good, bad or not deserving. Since I don't have the benefit of catching practice, and therefore can't form my opinions based on my own eyes, I have to trust what I know based on probabilities I learned as I guy who used to play sports.

At the time, my whole argument was based on the fact that Helton, like any coach, would make his decision based on what was in HIS interest and not necessarily what was the correct decision for the team. SC recruits each year with a plan for future years. Take your QB this year, he'll be the starter in two years. When 2 years arrives, they'll take another QB that they know will be their starter in two more years when the first QB leaves the program.

We saw this planned transition repeated over and over with Palmer to Leinert, then Booty to Sanchez, Sanchez to Barkley, Barkley to Cody. Each time the spacing was planned so that each QB would wait and learn for 2 years and then start for 2 years, with the exception of Barkley who got 3 years because Sanchez blew up the plan and left after only 1 year. The transitional QB system is there!

That's the way it works, it's the way it HAS to work for a coach that wants to succeed long term. The minute you break from this panned system you'll put yourself in a position where you have no backups as the other QBs transfer out of the program because they know they'll never play since they guy in front of them is younger. This progression is a VERY big deal.

Given this enormous fact, and the fact that I had never seen Sam myself, I just found it hard to believe that any QB with that little experience was going to be so good that a coach would be willing to blow up a planned QB transition system in place for years. Ultimately, that system won out.

Today, looking back I can tell you that even though that system won out, YOU WERE RIGHT, Sam was THAT good! He should have been the starter all along based on his talent, but unfortunately that's not the way sports work all the time. Helton only went to Sam when it was in HIS best interest.

Sam was a fantastic, unique talent, and I think he is actually much better than what we saw during his time at SC. If he had played under Pete/Chow, he'd have been much better and achieved greater things. With proper coaching I think he would have developed more, and went on to lead us to a few NCs. He truly was a great one.

So here's to you TGH, you were the gentleman that I believe I had the most heated discussions, well you and Adam Maya. You were absolutely right about Sam, he was that kind of talent.

Like I said, I didn't base my opinion base on his abilities, just the politics of the situation which always seems to win out.

Well done sir!

OT: What Obama left us...

Excerpts from a good comparison of what Obama left us, and the Trump challenge…

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455051/trump-obama-compare-results


From January 2009 to January 2016 … Barack Obama implemented the most progressive agenda since Franklin Roosevelt, …. Obama was … determined to move his party with him and “fundamentally transform” the country. His own skepticism about America’s past, its current values, and its future trajectories resonated on the world stage. …The Democratic party was reborn in Obama’s leftist image. ….Among Obama’s signature foreign policies were “lead from behind” in Libya; quietude during the Iranian anti-theocratic protests; strategic patience with North Korea; the multifaceted and often clandestine efforts to swing the Iran deal; the Russian “reset”; realignment away from Israel, Egypt, and the Gulf monarchies; and rapprochement with Cuba, Venezuela, and the South American Communist and socialist states. ..All reflected his own larger visions of European Union and American progressivism as models for transnational world governance. A global council of Davos-like elites would best adjudicate climate-change crises, the excesses of capitalism, dangerous nationalism, the parochial and outdated restrictions on migration and immigration, and the lingering but still pernicious legacies of Western imperialism and colonialism.

“Crises” such as the spreading ISIS caliphate, a nuclear North Korea with intercontinental missiles, an expanding Iranian-Shite-Hezbollah–Middle East crescent, a new greater East Asia prosperity sphere led by China that builds bases in the Spratly Islands, and a failed reset with Russia would more or less work themselves out on their own, given that all these dangers ultimately had their geneses in Western pathologies. Be better Western leaders, Obama intoned, and the Other would react accordingly and thus positively.

Politicization- Identity politics, progressive policing of ideas on campus, an end to campus free expression that only empowered hate speech, the politicization and expansion of the deep state, along with open borders and new laxities governing citizenship and voting would usher in new, kinder and gentler race, ethnicity, and gender agendas. A single EPA director, one high IRS commissioner, or a federal-appeals-court justice would now exercise far more political power than any congressional committee. The “law” — in the sense of customary non-surveillance of American citizens, disinterested attorneys general, or a nonpartisan bureaucracy — was redefined as whatever would best serve social justice and equality.

On the economic side, more regulations, larger government, more entitlements, higher taxes, zero interest rates, and doubling the national debt were designed to redistribute income and “spread the wealth.” …. (engender) a robust, globalized high-tech and coastal informational economy, shepherded by a new breed of progressive activist zillionaires like Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, George Soros, Tom Steyer, and Mark Zuckerberg. These new fortunes were cleaner, bigger, and put to better use than those of the old oil, rail, steel, mining, manufacturing, real-estate, farming, gaming, hotel, and construction wealth of the past. Big green and liberal money was now a good progressive thing. Sermons such as “you didn’t build that,” “now is not the time [for companies] to profit,” and “at a certain point you’ve made enough money”….

…By January 2017, American culture and the economy at home and foreign policy abroad reflected Obama’s values: pathways to abortion on demand, radical gun control, tribalism, and democratic socialism. …Then came the unforeseen nomination, election, and governance of Donald J. Trump. …Trump was determined to ram through a conservative agenda not seen since the Reagan revolution of 1981–89 — and to govern as conservatively as Obama had progressively. …(in) his first eleven months (tax reform and reduction, conservative judges and cabinet heads, stepped-up energy production, deregulation, a new realist and deterrent foreign policy, immigration recalibration) will either grow the economy in ways that the prior administration could not, make American stronger and the world safer in a way the prior administration could not, and redirect American culture and values back in a more traditional direction — or it will not. ….Antidote One, of unapologetic progressivism under Obama, did not lead to an economically robust and growing America, one safer abroad in a more secure world, and more cohesive, united, and stable at home …, America as just another nation among many, and a cultural revolution aimed at accentuating rather than assimilating race, class, and gender identities. We shall see if the subsequent Antidote Two, of unregretful conservatism under Trump, will provide what conservatism has always promised: greater prosperity, security, and unity.

An injury update on JT Daniels

I just spoke to U.S. Army All-American Bowl representative Lauren Ivancich about five-star quarterback JT Daniels and any potential injuries.

Daniels took a very hard hit earlier in the game and hasn't returned to action.

But according to Ivancich, Daniels seems perfectly healthy.

"I just saw JT on the bench while I was walking by. (He) looks fine to me."

If I hear anything else, I'll post it.

Chris and Adam

Hey,

I can't take it, I feel like SC is just falling behind the other powers with Helton. Time with Helton is lost progress.

Do you guys feel that there will be changes to the staff? Do you really think or have you heard that Swann will indeed mandate it? Lastly, are you in agreement with me that the best thing SC can do is trash this offensive system, get new offensive coaches and get back to a more traditional "big boy" power scheme that passes off the running game?

It feels like I haven't heard anything from Helton to explain this latest embarrassment or to explain this ho hum underachieving season. What's going on out there?

IMG Academy

So with Bookie going to Oklahoma, that marks the third player just this year who transferred there from California NOT to attend a Pac-12 school. (Him plus TJ Pledger and Brian Hightower).

Are these kids who simply want to get out of California for college? Seems that way but any insight behind that would be interesting.

What I've been told about a DB target...

I spoke to someone I trust about Anaheim Servite HS DB Julius Irvin. I was told Irvin isn't too focused on the recruiting process right now because of his recent family emergency. This family emergency is a very big deal and a life changing event. I'll leave it there.

That being said, Irvin still has a decision to make. He will sign in February and has one official visit left if he wants to take it. There's a possibility that could happen.

Irvin has already been to four of his top 5 schools on official visits, so there's a possibility his final visit will be to USC. I was also told there's a chance he visits a school outside of his top 5 (Florida could be a school to watch as the Gators offered him a scholarship in late December).

This person I talked to said, in his estimation, it's currently a Notre Dame, USC and Washington battle. But he believes another team could possibly emerge. It's worth noting that there are some around Irvin who prefer Utah (apparently the official visit was the most impressive by far.)

This person also said that while Irvin hasn't made a decision, he would guess USC and Washington before Notre Dame. He believes Washington is a serious dark horse candidate that too many people are counting out. He believes Washington is right there with the Trojans and both are likely ahead of Notre Dame. But it wouldn't be a shock at all if the Irish pulled it off and got Irvin.

When I asked if Irvin's family emergency could factor into him staying in Southern California and attending USC, I was told it definitely could. It's a serious enough matter that it could, without question, keep Irvin at home and put him in cardinal and gold.

But I was also told, again, that Irvin's family still isn't happy with how USC has recruited him recently. Irvin was set to sign during the early period and the Trojan coaching staff told him to hold off.

"They screwed up," this source said. "If they let him sign early, it would be over and we all know he would have picked USC."

There's also concerns outside of how USC recruited him. There are some around Irvin that aren't impressed with the product the Trojans have put on the field this season. The recent Cotton Bowl was just more evidence to those around him that have doubts.

I'll you all updated if I hear anything else.

Login to view embedded media

Postmortem QB thoughts

Sam's been an amazing quarterback, we were lucky to have him. That being said, is it possible we've overrated him because his physical gifts are so tremendous (and easy to see) but maybe there's a lack QB IQ? Sam turned the ball over 22 times by himself (compared to 5 for the entire rest of the team). They weren't all his fault, but what about the pick-6 in the Cotton Bowl? That was a simple mental (missed the safety read) mistake at a critical big-game game moment. Forgivable for freshmen, but the number one overall pick? Our single back offense is designed around the QB option. How often did Sam run with the ball? The few times he did were almost always successful. Are we sure all those stuffed goal-line plays weren't read options where Sam probably should have kept the ball? It didn't look like our coaching staff trusted Sam to read defenses and audible, most of the time he was looking to the sideline after the defense lined up so the coaches could read the defense. We know Helton would never say so, he protects his players and staff to a fault.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT