Okay, now that Sam is gone one must give credit where credit is due! First let's get some background.
I went round and round with many on this site predicting that there was no way Sam would be the starter going into game 1.
I was correct,
HOWEVER, I never said that I didn't believe Sam was good, bad or not deserving. Since I don't have the benefit of catching practice, and therefore can't form my opinions based on my own eyes, I have to trust what I know based on probabilities I learned as I guy who used to play sports.
At the time, my whole argument was based on the fact that Helton, like any coach, would make his decision based on what was in HIS interest and not necessarily what was the correct decision for the team. SC recruits each year with a plan for future years. Take your QB this year, he'll be the starter in two years. When 2 years arrives, they'll take another QB that they know will be their starter in two more years when the first QB leaves the program.
We saw this planned transition repeated over and over with Palmer to Leinert, then Booty to Sanchez, Sanchez to Barkley, Barkley to Cody. Each time the spacing was planned so that each QB would wait and learn for 2 years and then start for 2 years, with the exception of Barkley who got 3 years because Sanchez blew up the plan and left after only 1 year. The transitional QB system is there!
That's the way it works, it's the way it HAS to work for a coach that wants to succeed long term. The minute you break from this panned system you'll put yourself in a position where you have no backups as the other QBs transfer out of the program because they know they'll never play since they guy in front of them is younger. This progression is a VERY big deal.
Given this enormous fact, and the fact that I had never seen Sam myself, I just found it hard to believe that any QB with that little experience was going to be so good that a coach would be willing to blow up a planned QB transition system in place for years. Ultimately, that system won out.
Today, looking back I can tell you that even though that system won out, YOU WERE RIGHT, Sam was THAT good! He should have been the starter all along based on his talent, but unfortunately that's not the way sports work all the time. Helton only went to Sam when it was in HIS best interest.
Sam was a fantastic, unique talent, and I think he is actually much better than what we saw during his time at SC. If he had played under Pete/Chow, he'd have been much better and achieved greater things. With proper coaching I think he would have developed more, and went on to lead us to a few NCs. He truly was a great one.
So here's to you TGH, you were the gentleman that I believe I had the most heated discussions, well you and Adam Maya. You were absolutely right about Sam, he was that kind of talent.
Like I said, I didn't base my opinion base on his abilities, just the politics of the situation which always seems to win out.
Well done sir!